Metro Vancouver’s board headed off a motion Friday to slash board member’s pay by tossing the idea to yet another “independent” review of the regional district as it grapples with rising costs and increasing public distrust. Read More

Article content
Metro Vancouver’s board headed off a motion Friday to slash board member’s pay by tossing the idea to yet another “independent” review of the regional district as it grapples with rising costs and increasing public distrust.
Article content
Article content
Article content
Metro director Brad West, who is also Mayor of Port Coquitlam, called for his 40 director colleagues to cut their meeting stipends in half, to $273.50 from $547 per meeting, end additional stipends for meetings longer than four hours, and cut the regional district’s list of 16 committees in half.
Article content
Advertisement 1
Story continues below
Article content
Article content
He said he took the step as a way to answer public outrage over the appearance of Metro directors getting exorbitant pay while taxpayers struggle with affordability and rising taxes.
Article content
Article content
Article content
At Friday’s board meeting, however, the board voted instead to put the issue of director compensation to an independent review by a panel of experts struck by Metro’s board chair Mike Hurley. It is led by business executive and former premier Glen Clark and former finance minister Colin Hansen.
Article content
Article content
Hurley also used his authority to trim the number of committees by folding the regional culture committee into its finance committee, the flood resiliency committee into the air quality and climate committee and by dissolving the Fraser crossing task force.
Article content
Article content
Hurley acknowledged those cuts would only save about $50,000 on a forecast 2026 budget of $1.6 billion, but he defended it as a small step in the more substantial set of governance and core-service reviews Metro has underway.
Article content
Advertisement 2
Story continues below
Article content
Article content
Hurley insisted the reviews are “definitely not window dressing,” though it is unclear how much in the way of cost savings might come from it.
Article content
Article content
Stories You May Like
-
New Westminster mayor sides with Metro Vancouver in Surrey spat
-
Surrey finds friends among neighbours in argument over Metro Vancouver planning
-
Advertisement embed-more-topic
Story continues below
Article content
“I am, and people who know me, know I’m a person of action,” Hurley said. “I want this committee and this board working in the most positive way possible, working in the most financially viable manner.”
Article content
Article content
During Friday’s meeting Hurley unveiled the consultants Metro has hired for the reviews.
Article content
Article content
The consulting firm Deloitte was hired from a list of five bidders to take on a look at the Metro board’s committee structure, composition and remuneration, with input from the expert third-party panel.
Article content
Article content
Metro also hired an independent review team lead by consulting engineer Peter Milburn, who has conducted examinations of huge projects including B.C. Hydro’s Site C dam, to consider what went wrong in Metro’s now $3.86 billion North Shore sewage treatment plant.
Article content
Article content
Hurley defended the reviews arguing that he wants all the outside help Metro can get to make decisions based on “facts and figures,” not emotion.