**Published Oct 14, 2025 • 5-minute read**
**Join the conversation**
A row of townhouses is currently under construction in Wasaga Beach, Ontario. Photo by DonFord1 / iStock / Getty Images
This past summer, an exhibition in Toronto revisited the well-known and tragic tale of the Titanic, which sank over a century ago after colliding with an iceberg, resulting in the loss of more than 1,500 lives. Just when it seemed there was nothing new to uncover about this historic disaster, its lessons resonate disturbingly in today’s context. The tragedy might have been averted had safety protocols been adhered to. The disaster was attributed to excessive speed, neglecting iceberg warnings, and failing to meet lifeboat requirements. Many of the necessary regulations existed; they simply weren’t enforced. This heartbreaking incident highlighted the consequences of inadequate oversight and enforcement, ultimately leading to significant reforms in maritime safety standards to safeguard the public.
**Advertisement**
**Story continues below**
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
**Don’t have an account? Create Account or View more offers**
Numerous contemporary tragedies echo this theme, serving as a stark reminder that public safety regulations are only effective when properly enforced. In 2023, the Titan submersible, en route to the Titanic wreck, tragically imploded underwater, claiming the lives of five individuals. The CEO openly expressed his contempt for regulations, claiming they stifled progress and innovation. He famously remarked, “If you want to be safe, don’t get out of bed…” This blatant disregard for sound design and safety protocols culminated in a devastating outcome.
The 2013 Lac Megantic train derailment in Quebec exemplified the consequences of insufficient regulations for transporting hazardous materials, coupled with weak enforcement and oversight. Similarly, the 2022 Surfside condo collapse in Miami was attributed to poor design and inadequate inspections.
**Advertisement**
**Story continues below**
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
We frequently hear that powerful industries resist regulation, arguing that it stifles innovation and economic growth. However, as members of the public, we rely on health and safety regulations to protect us. When we board an airplane, we expect it to be manufactured to high standards, with pilots and crew adequately trained. We anticipate that our food has undergone thorough inspections and that health regulations are enforced. When purchasing a new home, we expect it to be constructed by skilled tradespeople and subjected to proper inspections. Consumers are unlikely to invest in products or services they perceive as threats to their health, safety, or financial well-being.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford has often criticized what he terms “red tape,” or excessive regulation. In 2018, he established a ministry focused on Red Tape Reduction to stimulate the economy by eliminating overly bureaucratic regulations. While we support economic advancement, it should not come at the expense of safety and well-being.